Solar Inspection Before Buying a Home With Panels
Use this solar inspection before buying a house dossier to verify ownership, records, production, roof, electrical condition, transfers, and closing duties.
Dan Katzman
Founder, Teamsun
A solar inspection before buying a house should be more than a quick look at the panels. Before waiving a contingency or closing, establish who owns the equipment and debt, obtain the approved design and utility records, reconcile 12–24 months of production, commission qualified roof and electrical review, and assign every transfer, defect, and closing deliverable to a named party.
The right output is not “solar passed.” It is a dated due-diligence dossier that separates verified facts, professional findings, seller representations, contract interpretations, and unresolved items. No inspection can promise clean title, code compliance, system performance, warranty transfer, program eligibility, or added home value.
Direct answer: resolve the legal ownership gate first; freeze the exact equipment and records; compare production with weather, downtime, and utility data; have qualified professionals inspect the roof, attachments, electrical system, battery, and safety equipment; then convert every exception into a repair, document, transfer, escrow, credit, or withdrawal decision before its deadline.
Teamsun has a maintenance and repair inquiry route for Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. That link does not establish that Teamsun offers real-estate inspections, serves as a home inspector, determines title, supports every installed brand, or can meet a closing deadline. No audited Teamsun inspection reports, prices, credentials, transaction outcomes, production benchmarks, or transfer results were available for this guide.
When should solar due diligence happen in a home purchase?
Start before the offer if the listing discloses solar; otherwise start as soon as the system is discovered. The buyer needs enough time inside the applicable inspection, financing, title, insurance, attorney-review, and contract-transfer windows. A report delivered after those rights expire may be informative but no longer protective.
| Transaction point | Buyer request | Decision that should remain open |
|---|---|---|
| Before offer | Ownership type, contract party, approximate install date, battery presence, active alerts, known roof work | Whether to offer, request records, or add solar-specific review topics |
| Offer drafting | Access rights, records deadline, qualified inspection access, monitoring export, seller authorization to contact providers | Inspection and document contingencies; remedies and response timing |
| Inspection window | Physical findings, exact equipment, production reconciliation, service/recall register | Accept, investigate, negotiate a defined remedy, or exercise contractual rights |
| Loan/title/insurance review | Loan, lease/PPA, UCC/title, appraisal classification, property-policy requirements | Whether financing and closing conditions can be satisfied |
| Before closing | Written payoff/assumption/transfer status, completed repairs, closeout evidence, credentials and access handoff | Whether stated closing conditions are complete |
| After recording | Manufacturer/monitoring/utility/program account confirmation and baseline operating check | Escalation under the closing documents if a promised handoff fails |
The DOE buyer guide tells buyers to ask about system age, roof age, inverter type, installer, warranties, production, monitoring, battery, and ownership. Use those questions as the starting index—not as a substitute for contract, title, lender, utility, roof, electrical, and performance review.
This page owns the buyer’s pre-offer-to-closing evidence gate. The moving-with-solar guide owns the current owner’s move-horizon decision; the closed-installer recovery guide owns reconstruction when the original company is gone. Lease/PPA assumption terms, seller document preparation, storm inspection, and roof-leak diagnosis require their own deeper work.
Who owns the panels, the debt, and the electricity contract?
Do not order a performance opinion until the legal-party map is underway. A productive array can still create a closing problem if the seller does not own it, a separate debt remains, the lender treats it differently than expected, or a lease/PPA transfer is not approved.
Ownership and encumbrance gate
| Claimed structure | Evidence to return | Buyer-side reviewers | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seller-owned, paid off | Purchase contract, paid invoice, payoff/release if once financed, warranty owner, title/UCC findings | Attorney/title professional, lender, appraiser | Seller statement conflicts with debt, title, UCC, or contract records |
| Separate solar loan | Note, security agreement, current payoff, collateral description, UCC/fixture filings, written closing treatment | Lender, attorney/title, creditor | No written payoff/assumption/subordination route by deadline |
| Lease | Full agreement and amendments, lessor, payment/escalation, term, purchase/removal/transfer/default clauses, written transfer process | Lessor, buyer lender, attorney/title, insurer | Buyer has not received or accepted exact approved transfer terms |
| Power purchase agreement | Full agreement/amendments, energy-price schedule, term, production/billing terms, buyout/transfer/default clauses | PPA owner, buyer lender, attorney/title, insurer | Contract party or assumption approval remains unknown |
| Unknown/mixed | Every solar-related credit report item, seller payment, title exception, UCC result, installer/financier/owner statement | Attorney/title and lender lead | Ownership cannot be reconciled; do not treat equipment as included or valuable |
Fannie Mae’s current solar property guide distinguishes borrower-owned, separately financed, leased, and PPA systems. It puts ownership and financing determination on the lender, requires review of credit/title and related documents, and may require a UCC personal-property search when ownership is unclear. Its appraisal and debt treatment varies by structure. That is an underwriting example, not a universal rule for every loan.
Do not equate “UCC found” with “bad title,” or “not on the title report” with “no security interest.” Fixture filings, personal-property financing statements, precautionary filings, recorded instruments, and payoff/termination documents can have different legal effects. The buyer should give the exact records to the lender and a qualified real-estate/title professional; a solar contractor should not certify title.
Likewise, do not promise a home-value premium. Ownership classification, condition, market evidence, appraisal method, and lender rules all matter. The appraiser—not the installer, listing agent, or production app—determines what analysis is supportable for that assignment.
What documents belong in the buyer’s solar dossier?
Require a return schedule, not a vague request for “solar paperwork.” Each row needs a file, a named custodian, a date, and a status of verified, seller-provided, professional opinion, incomplete, or unavailable.
| Dossier folder | Minimum contents | Why it matters before closing |
|---|---|---|
| Parties and contracts | Legal seller name; equipment owner; installer; sales company; financier/lessor/PPA owner; contracts, amendments, payoff and transfer instructions | Establishes who can authorize inspection, repair, access, warranty, and transfer |
| Approved design | Original proposal, final as-built plan, one-line diagram, array layout, module/inverter/optimizer/microinverter/battery/gateway/racking schedules | Lets the inspector compare installed equipment and topology with the approved record |
| Permit and utility | Building/electrical permits, inspection signoffs, interconnection application/agreement, meter record, permission to operate, later amendment approvals | Separates original approval from unapproved changes and current account status |
| Equipment identity | Photos of accessible labels by a qualified person or safe ground-level evidence; model and serial register; install/replacement dates | Enables warranty, recall, compatibility, monitoring, and service research |
| Warranties and service | Product, workmanship, roof/penetration, performance or service contracts; claims; RMAs; repairs; invoices; open tickets | Shows exact obligor, term, exclusions, prior defects, and transfer requirements |
| Performance | 12–24 months of monitoring exports, monthly utility bills, interval/import/export data if available, outage/reporting timeline | Tests continuity and creates a baseline without promising future output |
| Programs and attributes | Incentive approval, payee/beneficiary, REC owner, production-reporting obligation, battery-program agreement, tax records the seller elects or is required to provide | Prevents assuming a credit, payment, REC, or tax position follows the house |
| Property interfaces | Roof age/material records, reroof/repair invoices, attic/ceiling moisture history, insurance claims, storm/tree work, electrical upgrades | Connects solar condition to roof, structure, service equipment, and insurability |
The final as-built matters more than the sales proposal. Count and nameplate should reconcile: module quantity × module watts equals DC nameplate; inverter and battery models should match labels; array map should match roof planes; later replacements should have permits, warranty records, or updated drawings where required. A mismatch is a question, not automatic proof of wrongdoing.
Warranties also do not “come with the house” merely because a PDF exists. Record the exact product, serial, original registration, current owner, remaining term, transfer procedure, deadline, fee, authorized-service conditions, labor/shipping exclusions, and written acceptance. The FTC solar consumer guide advises reviewing warranties and what happens when the owner sells; exact documents control.
How should 12–24 months of production and utility data be reconciled?
The goal is not to prove that every electric bill is low. It is to reconstruct what the system produced, what the home consumed, what the meter imported/exported, when data were missing, and which changes explain the record.
Production reconciliation worksheet
| Period | Monitoring solar kWh | Utility export kWh | Utility import kWh | Billing days/rate | Known event | Evidence status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | Snow / outage / reporting gap / repair / occupancy change | Complete / partial / missing |
Follow these checks:
- Export native monthly or daily data; do not rely on a seller’s screenshot alone.
- Align dates and billing periods. Monitoring months and utility cycles may not match.
- Keep production, export, import, and whole-home consumption separate. Solar production is not the same as export or avoided purchases.
- Mark internet/communications gaps separately from confirmed zero production.
- Note snow, shade growth, storms, outages, curtailment, equipment replacement, roof work, vacancies, EV/heat-pump additions, and occupancy changes.
- Compare like seasons and address-specific model inputs. Do not convert one low month or one annual total into a defect diagnosis.
- Reconcile program/REC reports with the monitoring meter and payee records where relevant.
A useful derived identity is:
estimated site use = utility imports + solar production − utility exports
Use it only when all three datasets cover the same interval and measurement boundaries. If the system lacks consumption monitoring, do not call solar production “home usage.” Weather-normalized or modeled comparisons need the exact design, shading, losses, degradation assumption, downtime, and model version. The DOE buyer guide recommends requesting historical production and monitoring access, but its general maintenance signal is not a warranty threshold or a substitute for system-specific analysis.
Record an unknown rather than inventing a benchmark. No Teamsun production history, bills, modeled output, defect frequency, or savings dataset was available to set an expected yield for an inherited system.
What should a qualified solar, roof, electrical, and battery inspection cover?
Buyers should not climb the roof, open covers, operate unfamiliar disconnects, reach under modules, remove guards, test energized conductors, or handle a battery. OSHA identifies shock, electrocution, burn, arc-flash, and fall hazards in PV work (OSHA solar electrical safety). Illuminated modules can energize DC circuits; a switched AC disconnect is not proof that the roof is electrically safe.
| Scope | Qualified inspection and return evidence | What a visual check cannot promise |
|---|---|---|
| Roof/attic/structure | Covering condition, remaining-life evidence, leaks/moisture, deck/rafters/trusses, deflection, prior repairs, drainage, need for roofer/engineer | Leak source, structural capacity, or remaining life from age alone |
| Attachments/flashing/racking | Attachment locations/types, flashing/seal interfaces, fasteners, clamps, rail alignment, corrosion, movement, roof clearances and access | Watertightness behind every concealed interface |
| Modules and DC wiring | Exact modules, glass/frame/backsheet/junction-box condition, cable support/abrasion, connectors, wire management, animal/storm evidence, qualified tests | Electrical health from an aerial photo |
| Inverter/MLPE | Exact inverter, optimizer or microinverter map; logs/errors; ventilation/enclosure; AC/DC readings/tests per manufacturer | Normal lifetime output from “green light” alone |
| AC/service/interconnection | Disconnects, breakers, labeling, grounding/bonding, service equipment, meter/configuration, installed one-line, later work | Current code compliance solely from an old permit |
| Rapid shutdown/fire access | Installed initiation and controlled conductors/equipment; labels; accessible shutdown test by qualified personnel; array access/setbacks as approved | That every component operates from a label’s presence |
| Battery/backup | Exact battery/gateway/control models, location/enclosure, condition, warnings, protected-load panel, communications, firmware, qualified functional and outage-mode test plan | Runtime, whole-home backup, black start, or solar restart without exact design/test |
| Closeout | Findings keyed to photos/array map; test instruments/results; inaccessible areas; severity; code/permit/AHJ questions; repair options | Clean title, warranty coverage, utility approval, or future performance |
DOE explains that rooftop solar typically requires local permitting and inspection before utility interconnection (DOE permitting and inspection). A historic permit proves what an authority accepted at that time; it does not prove the array is unchanged, defect-free, compliant with every later code, or operating today. Conversely, a missing file in the seller’s folder does not prove no approval exists—confirm with the issuing authority and utility.
If defects exist, use the solar warranty comparison to identify product, workmanship, roof, performance, and service obligations. Coverage must come from the actual contract/provider in writing.
How should recalls, open defects, and deferred maintenance be recorded?
Build a current register before negotiating. Search the exact manufacturer, product name, model, serial range, and date in the manufacturer’s safety/service notices and the CPSC recall database. A brand-level search is not enough; a matching model name is not enough if the serial/date range differs.
| Item | Evidence | Severity/operating instruction | Owner | Closing disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active inverter alert | Event export, first/last date, affected device, qualified diagnosis | Emergency / shutdown by qualified party / monitor / routine | Seller, service provider, equipment owner | Repair and test / escrow topic / accepted exception |
| Roof moisture | Interior and roof findings, weather history, attachment map | Protect area; roofer/solar coordination | Seller and named contractors | Defined repair/closeout or unresolved risk |
| Recall/service campaign | Exact model/serial match, manufacturer notice, case number | Follow current manufacturer/CPSC instruction | Registered owner/manufacturer/provider | Remedy complete or written plan and responsibility |
| Deferred service | Prior estimate/ticket, failed component, monitoring gap | Qualified operating decision | Contract-defined party | Repair, credit, escrow, accept, or exercise rights |
| Battery warning/damage | Exact alert, safe-distance evidence, manufacturer/emergency guidance | Keep clear; emergency/utility/qualified response when indicated | Equipment owner/provider | Do not normalize as cosmetic |
Do not clear an alert, update firmware, power-cycle repeatedly, or open equipment just to make a pre-closing screen look normal. Preserve logs first. A repair is not closed until parts/serials, permits or utility amendments when required, monitoring map, test results, warranty record, and the defined observation period are returned.
What must be verified with Connecticut, Massachusetts, or Rhode Island programs?
Utility service, interconnection, tariffs, incentives, REC ownership, battery programs, and account access are separate ledgers. Ask the exact utility/program administrator what transfers, who must sign, whether the project remains eligible, which meter/account is involved, and when the change becomes effective. Get the response in writing.
| State | Current official route | Buyer file to obtain |
|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | PURA Residential Renewable Energy Solutions plus the exact Eversource or UI tariff/administrator | RRES approval/tariff option, payment beneficiary/payee, REC treatment, interconnection/PTO, meter/account and transfer correspondence |
| Massachusetts | MassCEC buying/selling solar guidance plus utility, SMART and net-metering administrators | SMART system/site/payee/remaining term/reporting, PTS record, net-metering allocation, interconnection/PTO and written transfer status |
| Rhode Island | RI Office of Energy Resources residential solar guide plus Rhode Island Energy/current administrator | Interconnection/PTO, tariff/program enrollment, REC/payment owner, meter/account, remaining obligations and written transition steps |
MassCEC says buyers should request production, monitoring and maintenance history and discuss ongoing incentives and their transfer process. It also notes that a SMART-approved system is tied to the exact system and site. Connecticut and Rhode Island pathways differ. Never infer that a seller’s historic payment, net-metering treatment, battery dispatch enrollment, tax position, or REC ownership automatically belongs to the buyer.
Tax records can help explain basis, incentives, ownership, or representations, but the buyer should not claim the seller’s original installation credit. A tax professional should review any buyer-specific tax consequence; this article does not provide tax advice.
Who is responsible for each pre-closing decision?
Solar due diligence is a relay. The transaction fails when everyone assumes someone else cleared the same issue.
| Party | Owns | Does not automatically own |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer/agent | Deadlines, access requests, dossier status, unresolved-item decisions | Technical diagnosis or legal interpretation |
| Seller/equipment owner | Authorization, complete representations/records, contracted payoff/transfer/repair duties | Buyer lender approval or warranty acceptance |
| Attorney/title professional | Contract language, title exceptions, UCC/fixture/closing-document analysis, remedy drafting | Electrical/roof condition or production modeling |
| Lender | Loan eligibility, debt treatment, required documents, appraisal instructions | Guarantee of solar condition or value |
| Appraiser | Assignment-specific contributory-value analysis under applicable standards | Title clearance, contract transfer, system commissioning |
| Insurer | Property coverage requirements, endorsements/exclusions, claim process | Equipment warranty or performance guarantee |
| Qualified solar/electrical provider | Defined inspection/tests, defect scope, permits and commissioning within credentials | Legal title, appraisal, tax, insurance, universal brand support |
| Roofer/engineer | Roof findings and structural analysis within scope | Electrical safety, utility approval, warranty transfer |
| Financier/lessor/PPA owner/manufacturer | Its contract, payoff/assumption, account/warranty/service procedures | Buyer’s broader closing rights or another party’s approval |
| Utility/program administrator | Account, tariff, interconnection and program processes | Contract title, property value, roof/equipment condition |
If the original installer is unavailable, use the orphan-system evidence recovery workflow. Do not let a new service provider silently become responsible for old workmanship, undocumented equipment, or another company’s guarantee.
How do repair, escrow, credit, and contingency decisions stay auditable?
Do not negotiate from a guessed lump sum. Build a no-number ledger, obtain qualified scopes, and let the transaction professionals convert it into any permitted remedy.
| Finding | Required scope elements | Evidence needed to price | Buyer decision after professional advice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component fault | Diagnostics, exact compatible part, access, removal/install, shipping/RMA, permit/amendment, commissioning | Written finding, model/serial, warranty response, itemized scope | Seller repair; credit; escrow where allowed; accept; exercise rights |
| Roof interface defect | Array access/removal, roofing, flashing/attachment, storage/reinstall, warranty, weather protection, tests | Roofer + solar scope and responsibility boundary | Same options, tied to roof/closing timing |
| Ownership/transfer issue | Payoff, consent, assumption, filing/termination, account/program transfer, closing document | Creditor/owner/utility/lender/title written requirements | Do not substitute repair money for unresolved legal transfer |
| Missing evidence | Authority search, record recreation, testing, excluded areas, uncertainty | Named custodian and deadline | Extend if agreed; accept unknown; or use contract rights |
Purchase-contingency topics for a licensed attorney include: the records due date; right of qualified access; seller authorization to contact contract/utility/manufacturer parties; acceptable evidence; who pays for destructive or invasive review; repair standards and licensed providers; permits and reinspection; monitoring/utility/program transfer; payoff/assumption conditions; reinspection; escrow release evidence; risk of loss; survival of representations; and remedies if a closing deliverable fails. This is an issue list, not contract language or legal advice.
Send the dossier and deadline for a solar scope discussion only after the seller or equipment owner authorizes access. Ask the responding provider to state exclusions, credentials, brands, fees, timing, deliverables, invasive-access assumptions, and whether it can coordinate roof/electrical/battery roles. Teamsun’s page does not promise any of those terms.
What is the stop, pause, or proceed gate before closing?
Use the most serious unresolved item—not the average score—to set the gate.
Stop
- Active fire, arcing, exposed energized equipment, severe battery warning, structural instability, or another immediate danger lacks qualified control.
- Equipment ownership, debt, lease/PPA party, title/UCC treatment, or lender acceptability cannot be reconciled.
- Required assumption/payoff/transfer approval is denied, or the transaction cannot meet a nonwaivable condition.
Pause
- Exact models/serials, permit/PTO, as-built, 12–24-month data, warranty terms, or monitoring transfer remain incomplete.
- A roof, electrical, battery, recall, production, or deferred-maintenance exception lacks a defined professional finding and closeout path.
- Utility/program/REC/payee status, insurance treatment, repair scope, or closing responsibility is still verbal.
Proceed—subject to the buyer’s advisers
- Ownership and finance classifications reconcile across contracts, lender, title/UCC review, and closing instructions.
- Physical findings, inaccessible areas, performance history, and open exceptions are documented and accepted or resolved.
- The closing checklist names each file, transfer, credential, repair test, account handoff, deadline, responsible party, and post-close confirmation.
Final acceptance should include the full dossier; executed payoff/assumption/transfer documents; keys/access; monitoring administrator and owner access; utility/program confirmations; exact warranty/account registrations; completed repair records; final permits/inspections/amendments where required; current production baseline; open-ticket list; and safe operating/emergency information. Passwords should be transferred through an appropriate secure process, not embedded in a shared PDF.
Frequently asked questions about buying a home with solar panels
Should a normal home inspector inspect the solar panels?
A home inspector may document visible conditions within the inspector’s license, standards, access, and contract, but that does not automatically include PV electrical testing, roof attachment analysis, battery commissioning, production reconciliation, title, or contract transfer. Ask for exact inclusions and retain qualified solar/electrical, roofing, engineering, legal, title, lender, or manufacturer roles as needed.
Can I inspect rooftop solar panels myself before buying?
No. Stay on the ground and do not open equipment, climb, reach under modules, operate unfamiliar disconnects, or test conductors. Provide safe photos and records. Qualified providers need the right electrical scope, roof access/fall plan, equipment instructions, and owner authorization.
Does a passed permit prove the system is still code compliant?
No. It documents an approval at a point in time. It cannot prove the system was not changed, all components remain functional, current requirements apply retroactively, or concealed work is defect-free. Compare permits/as-builts with current equipment and ask the AHJ about later work.
How much production history should the seller provide?
Request 12–24 months when available, covering native monitoring exports, bills, imports/exports, reporting gaps, outages, repairs, and occupancy/load changes. Less history is not automatic failure, but the missing period and resulting uncertainty should be explicit.
Does permission to operate transfer to the buyer automatically?
Do not assume it. PTO is evidence of original utility authorization, while account, tariff, interconnection, net-metering, program, payee, and equipment-owner changes may have separate procedures. Ask the exact utility/program administrator for written current steps.
Do solar warranties automatically transfer with the house?
No universal rule applies. Exact contracts control registration, transfer eligibility, deadline, fee, proof of sale, authorized service, and labor/shipping coverage. For example, Tesla publishes a Powerwall buyer process requiring post-sale contact and specific evidence, while SolarEdge and Enphase publish their own account/ownership processes. Those examples do not apply to other brands or promise acceptance.
What if the seller says the solar loan is paid off?
Request the creditor’s payoff/release evidence and let the lender and attorney/title professional reconcile credit, title, UCC/fixture, and contract records. A seller statement, zero payment, or missing title exception alone is not a clean-title opinion.
Can a lease or PPA simply be assumed at closing?
Not safely without the complete agreement and owner/lessor approval. Review payment or energy-price schedule, escalator, remaining term, transfer qualification, buyout/removal, default, roof work, insurance, sale, and lender requirements. Get the exact approved transition in writing.
Does solar guarantee a higher appraisal or resale value?
No. Do not add a promised premium. Ownership, contract structure, condition, performance evidence, market data, appraisal standards, and lender rules affect the assignment. Fannie Mae, for example, treats owned, financed, leased, and PPA systems differently.
Should a buyer ask for a production guarantee?
Ask whether an existing contract contains one, who owes it, how output is measured, exclusions, claim procedure, transfer rules, and remaining term. An inspection provider’s modeled estimate is not a new guarantee unless a signed contract explicitly makes it one.
What if monitoring access cannot be transferred before closing?
Document the manufacturer/platform process and the evidence that can be prepared before closing, then make post-closing confirmation a named handoff item. Tesla’s current Powerwall example processes buyer transfer after the sale; other platforms differ. Monitoring access does not itself prove legal ownership or electrical health.
Should every defect be repaired before closing?
Not necessarily. Immediate hazards need qualified control, while other findings may be repaired, credited, escrowed where lawful and acceptable, accepted, or handled under contract rights. The buyer needs an itemized professional scope, responsibility, deadline, closeout test, and adviser review—not a guessed allowance.
Build the dossier before you inherit the uncertainty
A useful solar inspection before buying a house ends with three synchronized files: legal ownership and transfer, physical/operating condition, and closing responsibility. If one file is incomplete, mark the decision pause rather than turning an assumption into a promise.
Teamsun serves Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, but no verified first-party evidence was available for a paid inspection offering, inspection price or deadline, home-inspection credentials, every-brand access, lender/title work, warranty or monitoring transfer success, project records, production benchmarks, defect rates, repair outcomes, or customer results. Contact Teamsun to ask what solar review scope—if any—is available for the address and deadline; obtain legal, title, lender, appraisal, insurance, roof, structural, utility, tax, and manufacturer advice from the appropriate parties.
Written by
Dan Katzman
Founder, Teamsun
Teamsun writes practical solar guidance to help property owners compare equipment, project scope, costs, and long-term service before making a decision.
Keep going.
10 kWh vs 20 kWh Home Battery: What Changes?
Compare 10 and 20 kWh home batteries by usable energy, runtime inputs, power, solar recharge, reserve, aging, expansion, and installed scope.
Dan Katzman
Founder, Teamsun
10 kW Solar System Cost in New England
Evaluate a 10 kW solar system cost through exact DC and AC units, roof and electrical limits, load scenarios, financing, storage, and utility rules.
Dan Katzman
Founder, Teamsun